{"id":3054,"date":"2019-02-26T23:00:08","date_gmt":"2019-02-27T05:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/?p=3054"},"modified":"2020-12-09T16:32:51","modified_gmt":"2020-12-09T22:32:51","slug":"the-media-made-me-do-it-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/definitions\/the-media-made-me-do-it-2\/","title":{"rendered":"The Media Made Me Do It"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I heard from a correspondent who hates the phrase <em>gone missing<\/em>. His e-mail called it an &#8220;ear-abrading&#8221; and &#8220;vulgar&#8221; usage. &#8220;Sends me right round the bend, mate!&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>I did a little digging and found that he&#8217;s far from alone. &#8220;Gone missing,&#8221; according to a word nerd at the Boston Globe, is &#8220;the least loved locution of the decade.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>According to the Globe piece, this &#8220;chiefly British&#8221; phrase has been around since the 19th century, so it&#8217;s not some trendy new grotesquerie. It&#8217;s also not ungrammatical\u2014if you can go insane, you can surely go missing. So what makes people hate it so much?<\/p>\n<p>Especially considering the lack of a good alternative: I&#8217;ve always felt that &#8220;vanished&#8221; and &#8220;disappeared&#8221; sound as if the missing person was the victim of a magic trick. And &#8220;turned up missing&#8221;? Please spare me. Anybody with something better than <em>gone missing<\/em>, please write.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe it&#8217;s that we have a complicated relationship with European <em>savoir-faire<\/em> in general\u2026and the Brits in particular. Young American males, for instance, deal with a perceived sophistication gap, believing with some justification that English accents and guys named Colin get all the babes.<\/p>\n<p>Ever since that little 18th century uprising of ours, many Americans traditionally have viewed Mother England with an uneasy mix of nostalgia and rebellion, so Brit-isms such as &#8220;gone missing&#8221; can be irksome. Don&#8217;t you get irrationally annoyed when your artsy friend says, &#8220;Let&#8217;s wander about&#8221; instead of &#8220;around&#8221;? Or how about those people who write their phone numbers with periods instead of hyphens: 555.2940 instead of 555-2940\u2026why do I hate that? Even someone putting that heinous horizontal bar through a 7 makes me crazy: &#8220;Look at me; I&#8217;ve been overseas, and now even my 7&#8217;s are refined.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>How many otherwise sensible Americans are mesmerized by Britain&#8217;s royal family? And from Cary Grant to Hugh Grant, there&#8217;s never been a shortage of British actors in Hollywood. In the early days of talkies, except for gangsters, cowboys, and blue-collar parts, leading men and women had distinct English accents, even though some of them came from Hell&#8217;s Kitchen.<\/p>\n<p>Now that my correspondent has exposed my unthinking use of &#8220;gone missing,&#8221; it&#8217;s made me a kinder, gentler word nerd. Remember how the old, intolerant word nerd always blamed pretentiousness when people said &#8220;more importantly,&#8221; &#8220;close proximity,&#8221; or &#8220;comprised of&#8221;? I was being too hard. In fact, we are bombarded with these expressions daily by high-profile media hotshots till our resistance breaks down. With repetition by smug authority figures (who couldn&#8217;t pass English 101), some of the worst barbarities gain respectability.<\/p>\n<p>Since we&#8217;re on this subject, let&#8217;s look at some words that broadcasters mangle.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Envelope, envoy, enclave<\/strong>\u00a0 Though you&#8217;d never know it from what you hear over the airwaves, the preferred pronunciation of these words&#8217; first syllable is &#8220;enn&#8221; rather than the faux-French &#8220;ahn.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Alleged<\/strong>\u00a0 It must come as a shock to many announcers, but alleged is a two-syllable word. It&#8217;s pronounced uh-LEJD, not uh-LEDGE-id.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Camaraderie<\/strong>\u00a0 is a five-syllable word, but you usually hear only four in the media. That letter <em>a<\/em> before the <em>r<\/em> should be a clue to say comma-ROD-ery, not com-RAD-ery.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bestiality<\/strong>\u00a0 Everyone&#8217;s wrong about this one, because it&#8217;s not BEAST-iality. Look at the spelling and then tell me: how do you pronounce b-e-s-t?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Homage<\/strong>\u00a0 This word has spun out of control in the last several years, but for most of my adult life it was correctly pronounced HOMM-ij. Then came AHM-ij, and it went downhill from there. Now we have everyone sounding oh-so-elegant with the pseudo-sophisticated oh-MAHZH, for which there&#8217;s really no excuse.<\/p>\n<p><em>This classic grammar tip by our late copy editor and word nerd Tom Stern\u00a0was first published\u00a0on July 4, 2013.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I heard from a correspondent who hates the phrase gone missing. His e-mail called it an &#8220;ear-abrading&#8221; and &#8220;vulgar&#8221; usage. &#8220;Sends me right round the bend, mate!&#8221; he said. I did a little digging and found that he&#8217;s far from alone. &#8220;Gone missing,&#8221; according to a word nerd at the Boston Globe, is &#8220;the least [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,12,25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3054","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-definitions","category-effective-writing","category-humor"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3054"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3054"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3054\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3054"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3054"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3054"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}