{"id":2968,"date":"2018-11-27T23:00:02","date_gmt":"2018-11-28T05:00:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/?p=2968"},"modified":"2020-12-09T16:35:39","modified_gmt":"2020-12-09T22:35:39","slug":"basically-why-your-cohort-isnt-your-buddy-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/definitions\/basically-why-your-cohort-isnt-your-buddy-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Basically, Why Your Cohort Isn&#8217;t Your Buddy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I received an e-mail from a fellow fussbudget deploring <em>basically<\/em>. He considers it meaningless and useless, and if you think about it, he has a point. Say any sentence with it and without it, and basically there&#8217;s no change in meaning (see?).<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the most basic use of <em>basically<\/em> is as a promise to cut the nonsense and get down to business: &#8220;This plan is basically unworkable.&#8221; <em>Fundamentally, essentially,<\/em> and <em>the bottom line is\u00a0<\/em>&#8230;are similar expressions.<\/p>\n<p>Some people use <em>basically<\/em> as a sort of curtain-raiser, to give their remarks a smooth opening, like &#8220;I&#8217;d just like to say &#8230;&#8221; The trouble starts when it&#8217;s overused, and becomes a verbal crutch, alongside &#8220;um,&#8221; &#8220;like,&#8221; and &#8220;y&#8217;know.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Sometimes <em>basically<\/em> can reflect a goal or a wish, like <em>theoretically<\/em> or <em>in an ideal world<\/em>. &#8220;Basically, I&#8217;m trying to work out four times a week.&#8221; Other times, we use it to temper our statements so that they don&#8217;t seem aggressive or bombastic. &#8220;I just basically feel that the country&#8217;s headed in the wrong direction.&#8221; We don&#8217;t want to come off as overbearing, and this use of <em>basically<\/em> is a way of backing off a bit, conveying what the user hopes is some measure of humility and humanity.<\/p>\n<p>So, yes, <em>basically<\/em> is extraneous\u2014but at least it&#8217;s innocuous if used sparingly. The question my correspondent raised is if it ever adds anything meaningful to a sentence. A whole lot of smart, articulate people use it; you really do hear it everywhere. It must fill some arcane need.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe it&#8217;s because on its best day, <em>basically<\/em> can be used in all the senses discussed above: &#8220;I&#8217;d just generally like to say in all humility that essentially, in an ideal world, the bottom line is &#8230;&#8221; If you can express all that in one word, go ahead and use it.<\/p>\n<p>As for me, though, here&#8217;s a sentence I have no problem with: Basically, avoid using <em>basically<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>On to this week&#8217;s nominees for the Hall of Shame:<br \/>\n<strong>Cohort<\/strong> Your friend is a crony, confidant, or collaborator, but not a cohort. In ancient Rome, a <em>cohort<\/em> was a division of 300-600 soldiers. So careful speakers and writers avoid <em>cohort<\/em> when referring to one person. Your <em>cohort<\/em> is not your comrade, ally, teammate, or assistant. It&#8217;s a whole group, gang, team, posse: &#8220;A cohort of laborers went on strike.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nauseous<\/strong> Once upon a time, if you said &#8220;I&#8217;m nauseous,&#8221; it meant you were disgusting. Yes, it&#8217;s true, <em>nauseous<\/em> and <em>nauseating<\/em> once were synonymous. Years of carelessness shifted the focus of the adjective from the cause of the nausea to the person affected. Still, word nerds get a secret chuckle from hearing an obnoxious person say he was &#8220;nauseous&#8221; last night.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Blond, blonde<\/strong> A <em>blonde<\/em> is a woman with blond hair. Note the different spellings. The <em>e<\/em> at the end applies exclusively to women, except when the word&#8217;s an adjective. According to the Associated Press Stylebook, both men and women have <em>blond<\/em> hair\u2014no <em>e<\/em> in either case. (For the record, a man is a <em>blond<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Prone, supine<\/strong> &#8220;The victim was found lying prone, her eyes gazing sightlessly at a full moon.&#8221; Sorry, but this is a maneuver only the swivel-headed girl from <em>The Exorcist<\/em> could pull off, because when you&#8217;re <em>prone<\/em>, you&#8217;re lying on your stomach. Make that <em>supine<\/em>, which means &#8220;lying on one&#8217;s back.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Indicated that<\/strong> &#8220;A full 72 percent of respondents indicated that they have a room in their home devoted to entertainment.&#8221; Indicated? How, by charades? Smoke signals? Some writers will do anything to avoid <em>said<\/em>. Don&#8217;t fuss up your writing with <em>indicated, stated, asserted, uttered, averred,<\/em> etc. I&#8217;m obviously not vetoing words like <em>replied, added, declared, explained,<\/em> which have valid shades of meaning. But when reporting simple speech, just go generic with sweet little ol&#8217; <em>said<\/em>, over and over again. No one will notice and no one will mind.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u2014This was a classic Tom Stern grammar tip.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I received an e-mail from a fellow fussbudget deploring basically. He considers it meaningless and useless, and if you think about it, he has a point. Say any sentence with it and without it, and basically there&#8217;s no change in meaning (see?). Perhaps the most basic use of basically is as a promise to cut [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,10,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2968","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-adjectives-adverbs","category-definitions","category-effective-writing"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2968"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2968"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2968\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2968"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2968"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2968"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}