{"id":1556,"date":"2014-06-03T15:29:58","date_gmt":"2014-06-03T21:29:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/?p=1556"},"modified":"2020-11-25T10:32:52","modified_gmt":"2020-11-25T16:32:52","slug":"apostrophes-not-always-possessive","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/apostrophes\/apostrophes-not-always-possessive\/","title":{"rendered":"Apostrophes: Not Always Possessive"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Apostrophes\u2019 chief purpose is to show possession, but these marks have other functions, too. They alert readers when, and where, one or more letters are missing from a word, such as the <em>no<\/em> that is dropped when <em>cannot<\/em> becomes <em>can\u2019t<\/em>. Or they create separation to avoid confusion when two elements are combined for special reasons. For example, in <em>When Colin writes a\u2019s, they look like u\u2019s<\/em>, the apostrophes prevent us from thinking that the writer meant <em>as<\/em> and <em>us<\/em>. It\u2019s hard to imagine any credible writer not using apostrophes for <em>a\u2019s<\/em> and <em>u\u2019s<\/em>, but beyond that, apostrophe unanimity is hard to find.<\/p>\n<p>Apostrophes have a complicated relationship with plurals. Different writers have different approaches when writing the plural forms of abbreviations, some letters and numbers, and words that do not normally take plurals.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 What\u2019s the plural of an abbreviation with periods, like <em>Ph.D.<\/em>? There\u2019s no right answer. Some write <em>Ph.D.s<\/em>, some write <em>Ph.D.\u2019s<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Most writers use apostrophes when pluralizing single capital letters (<em>I earned three A\u2019s<\/em>), but there are some who would write <em>three As<\/em>. With groups of two or more capital letters, apostrophes seem less necessary (<em>two new MPs<\/em>, <em>learn your ABCs<\/em>), but some writers insist on them.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Single-digit numbers are usually spelled out, but when they aren\u2019t, you are just as likely to see <em>2s and 3s <\/em>as<em> 2\u2019s and 3\u2019s<\/em>. With double digits and above, many (but not everyone) regard the apostrophe as superfluous. Most writers nowadays favor <em>the 1900s<\/em>, but some go with <em> the 1900\u2019s<\/em>. If numerals are used to identify decades, <em>the \u201930s<\/em> is widely used, but you will also see <em>the 30\u2019s<\/em>, and occasionally even <em>the \u201930\u2019s<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 A keyboard caveat: it takes extra effort to generate an apostrophe when it is the first character in numbers or words like <em>the \u201930s<\/em> or <em>\u2019tis <\/em>(for \u201cit is\u201d). If you\u2019re not careful, you\u2019ll instead type an opening single quotation mark (<strong>\u2018<\/strong>), which is a backward and upside-down apostrophe. The result will be <em>the<\/em> \u2018<em>30s<\/em> and \u2018<em>tis<\/em>, which finicky readers consider an indefensible lapse.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Making words plural with <em>\u2019s<\/em> is usually a big mistake, but some writers, as a courtesy to readers, will add <em>\u2019s<\/em> to words that don\u2019t ordinarily become plural, as in <em>no if\u2019s, and\u2019s, or but\u2019s<\/em>, or <em>here are some do\u2019s and don\u2019t\u2019s<\/em>. Since two apostrophes in one word look clunky, you are more likely to see<em> do\u2019s and don\u2019ts<\/em>, which looks better, although<em> don\u2019ts<\/em> is inconsistent with <em>do\u2019s<\/em>. A better option might be to use italics to establish differentiation: no <em>if<\/em>s, <em>and<\/em>s, or <em>but<\/em>s; some <em>do<\/em>s and <em>don\u2019t<\/em>s.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Let\u2019s close with a possessive-apostrophe principle that confuses a lot of people. For the plurals of familiar compound nouns like <em>driver\u2019s license <\/em>and <em>master\u2019s degree<\/em>, the apostrophe stays the same; the plurals are <em>driver\u2019s licenses<\/em> and <em>master\u2019s degrees<\/em>. You may ask why not <em>drivers\u2019 licenses<\/em>\u2014after all, we\u2019re talking about more than one driver, aren\u2019t we? Well, yes and no. The <em>driver\u2019s <\/em>in <em>two driver\u2019s licenses <\/em>denotes that each license was issued to one driver only. The same reasoning applies to <em>master\u2019s degrees<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>No punctuation mark causes more confusion and dissent than apostrophes. If we could get together on the rules, maybe people would use them more.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Pop Quiz<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Find the incorrect sentence(s).<\/p>\n<p>1. You used too many ands in that paragraph.<br \/>\n2. Today\u2019s multiplication exercise will focus on 6\u2019s and 7\u2019s.<br \/>\n3. The decade of the \u201880s was marked by scandals.<br \/>\n4. In her note, the Ls all looked like Es.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Pop Quiz Answer<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Three of the sentences would be acceptable to at least some editors and publishers. The one incorrect sentence is No. 3: The decade of the <strong>\u2018<\/strong>80s was marked by scandals. Make it <em> <strong>\u2019<\/strong>80s<\/em>, with an apostrophe.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Apostrophes\u2019 chief purpose is to show possession, but these marks have other functions, too. They alert readers when, and where, one or more letters are missing from a word, such as the no that is dropped when cannot becomes can\u2019t. Or they create separation to avoid confusion when two elements are combined for special reasons. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,16,34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1556","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-abbreviations","category-apostrophes","category-possessives"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1556"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1556"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1556\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1556"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}