{"id":1060,"date":"2020-06-02T07:00:27","date_gmt":"2020-06-02T12:00:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/?p=1060"},"modified":"2021-02-18T09:48:14","modified_gmt":"2021-02-18T15:48:14","slug":"sweating-the-small-stuff","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/pronouns\/sweating-the-small-stuff\/","title":{"rendered":"Sweating the Small Stuff"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>At a football game a few years ago, the University of Notre Dame sold soda in cups that said, &#8220;Figthing Irish.&#8221; Did no one at this distinguished school have the time or pride to proofread a two-word slogan?<\/p>\n<p>Here are a few other items we&#8217;ve seen and now wish we hadn&#8217;t \u2026<\/p>\n<p><strong>Back to Basics<\/strong>\u00a0 Many professional journalists can&#8217;t find the subjects in their own sentences, like this one: &#8220;The final installment of those tapes\u2014340 hours\u2014were made public.&#8221; Make it &#8220;<em>was<\/em> made public.&#8221; The writer, distracted by &#8220;tapes&#8221; and &#8220;hours,&#8221; forgot that the subject, &#8220;installment,&#8221; was singular.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ho-Hum: More Who-Whom\u00a0 <\/strong>We&#8217;ve frequently discussed the difference between <em>who<\/em> (subject) and <em>whom <\/em>(object). Pronoun confusion has plagued our language for centuries. Some now claim that English would be fine without <em>whom<\/em>. But <em>whom<\/em> holds some mysterious attraction for people who shouldn&#8217;t be using it, because they keep getting it wrong, as in &#8220;\u2026 a man whom he thought was ready&#8221; (make it &#8220;<em>who<\/em> he thought was ready&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>Compare that with &#8220;Brown, who investigators had trouble reaching for interviews&#8221; and &#8220;Schulman, who he met on a blind date.&#8221; Here the writers were handed <em>whom<\/em> on a silver platter, but instead chose &#8220;who.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>How the Cookie Deconstructs\u00a0 <\/strong>Flawed sentences like those result from either carelessness or grammatical cluelessness. Just as prevalent, and deadly, is poor word choice caused by fuzzy thinking. Here&#8217;s a writer who sabotaged his own metaphor when he wrote, &#8220;\u2026 before the whole house of cards crumbles.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Dead leaves and old walls crumble. A house of cards collapses.<\/p>\n<p><em>This was a classic article by our late writer-editor Tom Stern from October 2013.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Pop Quiz<\/h2>\n<p>Try to spot the errors or lapses in these sentences, written by professionals.<\/p>\n<p>1. &#8220;The case is the latest in a series that have fueled public protests.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>2. &#8220;He was convicted in absentia to 20 years in prison.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>3. &#8220;\u2026 and Steenkamp, whom he believed was still in the bedroom.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>4. &#8220;\u2026 a deadline to Syria to turnover its weapons.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>5. &#8220;The first time either of them have heard the recording.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3>Pop Quiz Answers<\/h3>\n<p>Not all of these sentences have one right answer. See if your remedies agree with ours.<\/p>\n<p>1. The case is the latest in a series <em>of events <\/em>that have fueled public protests.<\/p>\n<p>2. He was <em>sentenced<\/em> in absentia to 20 years in prison.<\/p>\n<p>3. \u2026 and Steenkamp, <em>who<\/em> he believed was still in the bedroom. (i.e., who was still in the bedroom, he believed)<\/p>\n<p>4. \u2026 a deadline to Syria to <em>turn over<\/em> its weapons.<\/p>\n<p>5. The first time either of them <em>has<\/em> heard the recording.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At a football game a few years ago, the University of Notre Dame sold soda in cups that said, &#8220;Figthing Irish.&#8221; Did no one at this distinguished school have the time or pride to proofread a two-word slogan? Here are a few other items we&#8217;ve seen and now wish we hadn&#8217;t \u2026 Back to Basics\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,25,8,39,43,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1060","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-effective-writing","category-humor","category-pronouns","category-proofreading","category-subject-and-verb-agreement","category-whowhomwhoeverwhomever"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1060"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1060"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1060\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1060"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1060"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.grammarbook.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1060"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}